Art Law is a fascinating field of law. You would be amazed at how many issues get intertwined to solve certain cases: religion, history, moral considerations, traditions, not even talking about all the various legal acts. Sometimes you have so many different aspects to take into account that you don’t even know where to start. Likewise, lots of art related cases are actually so complex that they resemble the skilfully plotted detective story, rather than real life happenings.
I am delighted to add my contribution to the unique Art law platform — Artlaw.club — created and curated by an Attorney-at-law Ms. Irina Olevska.
Below you will find a list of my articles, published so far (I will update it on a regular basis, so stop by!).
A list of my articles:
- Book review: “Provenance: How a Con Man and a Forger Rewrote the History of Modern Art” — well-researched, well-written and captivating from the very first pages, this book is probably the best book I have read in 2018. Here is the review I wrote on it for the ArtLaw.club.
- A brief insight into the Rybolovlev-Bouvier “legal thriller” — an overview of the family of cases ongoing in various jurisdictions around the broken relationship in between a Russian billionaire and a Swiss art dealer.
- Blockchain in the art world — an article providing an overview of the blockchain developments relevant to the art world, as well as issues, which still remain to be tackled for this technology to be fully adopted.
- Blurred lines of creation: Can copyright laws ever catch up with the new world where AI created art gets auctioned at Christie’s? — a short review of the AI sprouting in the art market and some legal issues arising thereof
- Mediation and Art: is it a match made in Heaven? – which examines whether mediation is the best way to solve art-related disputes and whether mediation can help where litigation is consistently failing.
- Yours might have been yours, but now it’s mine: Appropriation artists and the shady area of copyright – a thought-provoking piece on the issue of authorship. Do you think that it would be possible to take a photo of a famous photo and claim it as yours without even mentioning the original author? Or can you just take someone else’s work, incorporate it in yours and once again – omit the original author? If you think “hell, no!” on both counts, think again, or better – read my article.
- So who’s the author? – where I pose a whole range of questions about defining an author for the purpose of copyright. It is not that straightforward, as frequently an artist, for example, comes up with an idea, yet it is not him, but a craftsman who realizes that idea… In such circumstances, who is then the author?
- Your Lautrec or Lautrec’s Lautrec? – which will be especially interesting if you plan on investing in a painting and want to know the difference between “by a studio of Rembrandt” and “by a circle of Rembrandt”. I talk about attribution and authentication: what is the difference and what is the process.
- “Copyright is for losers”. Graffiti as an IP outcast – where I give an overview of IP issues surrounding these disputable yet frequently highly appreciated (as well as priced!) artworks.